
Between Sea and Sky
This frame was taken from the window of a descending flight—a rare moment when clouds, coastline, and light lined up like a deliberate composition. What I saw wasn’t dramatic, just elemental: water, air, light. That was enough.
I chose monochrome not for effect, but for clarity. In colour, the image lost its cohesion—too many tonal distractions in the blue ranges, too much softness in the sea. Stripping it to black and white revealed a quiet structure beneath the atmosphere: horizontal bands of texture, density, and reflection.
Technically, the image stretches the limits of what you can get through a scratched plane window and turbulent light. The glass wasn’t clean, the light was shifting, and the aircraft’s movement didn’t allow for precise control. So I worked with what was there. Exposure was weighted to the water, allowing the clouds to drift toward grey-black without collapsing into silhouette. The reflected patch of sun near the bottom centre—deliberately retained—is the eye’s resting point, creating contrast and anchoring the frame.
The top third is weighty, brooding, filled with layered clouds holding back light. The middle is where the detail lives—rolling clouds, softened mountain edges, coastal forms almost eroded by distance. And the sea, vast and without visual noise, absorbs everything. The faint shadows of passing clouds stretch like underwater creatures, just visible.
Compositionally, the photograph doesn’t obey classic rules. It’s not about thirds or golden ratios. It’s about balance by mass: weight above, stillness below. I tilted the angle slightly to elongate the sky’s descent into the waterline, exaggerating the downward pull, rather than letting the image flatten into a postcard.
What I value here is restraint. The photograph doesn’t impress. It rests. It watches. It waits for the viewer to slow down enough to notice the line where water meets light, and where sky forgets to end.

