data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ce34/0ce34343029ac55d2cbe2851bc1d47df78cc8983" alt=""
A Few Shots with the 7Artisans 35mm f/0.95 in X-Mount
Let’s get straight to the point: here are a few shots taken with a Fuji X-T4 and a 7 Artisans 35mm f/.0.95 (obviously) in X-mount. All photos were taken at the widest (nominal) aperture of the lens, i.e. 0.95. I’m not sure if this is a real value, but it doesn’t matter because comparing the shutter speed with (relatively) slower lenses like the Zeiss Planar 32mm F1.8 shows that the 7 Artisans is proportionally faster, and that’s enough for me. – Initially published by 35mmc.com
This is an 8x crop of the featured image. Even wide open the lens was able to make the Ryanair word easily readable and I have found this performance quite impressive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b7c2/6b7c27594bc0768c2c1d661289922aa55ed8febb" alt=""
The bokeh is a little strange. As a fellow photojournalist pointed out discussing this picture, the circular shapes of the lights are reminiscent of a cathadioptric lens. Personally, I don’t dislike it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df99/5df99df78bdf9c7ce3da30d07ed6f286fff20c6a" alt=""
Colour reproduction, even in difficult conditions, is also pleasant. This image also shows the progressive loss of sharpness due to the wide aperture, as well as some chromatic aberration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d60f/1d60ffd4edc147b4028717ae61634836f1d082be" alt=""
In this image I have deliberately increased the shadows to hide the bakground and enhance the combination of the columns rising from a fountain and their reflection in the water. The lens is focused on the column in the foreground, again giving an idea of how progressive the bokeh could be.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4dda/b4ddaefb1a3d1f7d8ce3baf3260523ebe4fe55a1" alt=""
I am fairly happy with this lens as it produces good images, not only for its price but also in absolute terms.
Personally, I don’t follow the ‘value for money’ approach. If a lens performs poorly, claims like ‘you can’t expect more for such a small price tag’ are a nonsense: just don’t waste good money on bad lenses. By contrast, I prefer to focus (pun intended) on the results, so I have no problem in purchasing lenses from a lesser (or unknown) brand if it suits my aesthetic needs, or holding back on more expensive gear to get a less-than-proportional, marginal increase in quality.
Of course, you could challenge my photographic taste, but that would be a horse of a different colour.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7cd0/a7cd02d145e194acec853d57f2c5a76bfeab5020" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d10b/0d10b5ba40ff19ff74c477839d89f657de2f5304" alt=""